From: Anton Blanchard <anton@linuxcare.com.au>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: sys_sched_yield fast path
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:24:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010312122447.A7350@linuxcare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010312005448.A5439@linuxcare.com> <XFMail.20010312011030.davidel@xmailserver.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010312011030.davidel@xmailserver.org>; from davidel@xmailserver.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:10:30AM +0100
Hi,
> 2.4.x has changed the scheduler behaviour so that the task that call
> sched_yield() is not rescheduled by the incoming schedule(). A flag is
> set ( under certain conditions in SMP ) and the goodness() calculation
> assign the lower value to the exiting task ( this flag is cleared in
> schedule_tail() ).
The behaviour I am talking about is when there is a heavily contended
spinlock, and more than one task is trying to obtain it. Since SCHED_YIELD
only changes the goodness when we are trying to reschedule the task we
can bounce between two or more tasks doing sched_yield() for a while before
finally running the task that has the spinlock.
Of course with short lived spinlocks you should rarely get the case where
a task grabs a spinlock just before its timeslice is up, so maybe the answer
is just to spin a few times on sched_yield() then back off to nanosleep()
like pthreads does.
Anton
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-12 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-10 0:47 sys_sched_yield fast path Mike Kravetz
2001-03-10 11:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-10 16:59 ` Andi Kleen
2001-03-11 14:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-11 13:54 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-03-11 19:17 ` Dave Zarzycki
2001-03-12 0:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-11 23:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-12 0:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-03-12 1:24 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010312122447.A7350@linuxcare.com \
--to=anton@linuxcare.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.