All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Drokin <green@ixcelerator.com>
To: Manoj Sontakke <manojs@sasken.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: IP layer bug?
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:02:13 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010326110213.A17124@iXcelerator.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010326100941.A16800@iXcelerator.com> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103261739260.25784-100000@pcc65.sasi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103261739260.25784-100000@pcc65.sasi.com>; from manojs@sasken.com on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:51:43PM +0530

Hello!

On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:51:43PM +0530, Manoj Sontakke wrote:
> > > ip_options_compile() when called with first argument NULL resets cb to 0.
> > I have found that already.
> > > underlying layer(link and phy) could be anything so where from the
> > > ip_options should start will depend upon the underlying layer.
> > But here's the problem!
> > If I won't zero cb in my driver before netif_rx() call,
> > IP layer thinks that all my packets have various ip options set
> > (source routing most notable)
> U can set cb to zero, but u also plan to use cb for storing ur data. If
I use it for storing data, but when I do netif_rx() on skb, I cannot touch it
anymore, so no data there is belong to me, and if I read that code in
ip_input.c, it gets zeroed.
BTW, I found that it's not ip_input.c that sends me 'source routing rejected'
message, because no message is logged. It might be some other place.
But anyway something is wrong in IP layer.

> that happens then u need to modify the way the macro IPCB
> (probably in net/ip.h) is defined. Also make sure to increase the size 
> of cb to accomodate ur data. This will solve ur problem but making this
My data perfectly fits in cb of current size.

> general (part of the standard kernel code) needs a lot of work in the ip
> layer. The cb is also used by TCP. The same needs to be done in IP layer
> but this will again largly depend on the layers below and hence the
> complexity.
But comment in skbuff.h claims that any owner of skb can use cb for its own needs, till it passes ownership to whoever else.

> The alternative to this is that u can add another buffer like cb in
> sk_buff.
What for?

Bye,
    Oleg

  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-26  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-24 21:57 IP layer bug? Oleg Drokin
2001-03-26 10:36 ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-03-26  6:09   ` Oleg Drokin
2001-03-26 12:21     ` Manoj Sontakke
2001-03-26  7:02       ` Oleg Drokin [this message]
2001-03-30 17:13 ` kuznet
2001-03-31 15:03   ` Oleg Drokin
2001-03-31 15:32     ` kuznet
2001-04-02  9:25       ` Oleg Drokin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010326110213.A17124@iXcelerator.com \
    --to=green@ixcelerator.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manojs@sasken.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.