From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Tom Gall <gall@rochcivictheatre.org>
Cc: Tony Mantler <nicoya@apia.dhs.org>,
Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui@highway.ne.jp>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem inrecent kernel
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010330144041.A23536@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AC3F85F.88D020BE@rochcivictheatre.org>; from gall@rochcivictheatre.org on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:07:11PM -0600
On Thu, Mar 29, Tom Gall wrote:
>
> Tony Mantler wrote:
>
> > That's #if*n*def, not #ifdef. :)
> >
> > And speaking of #ifndef, why are these spinlocks here in the first place
> > and/or why do they now need to be removed? Just suddenly removing locks
> > because of a new deadlock condition gets my spidey senses tingling.
>
> It all stinks to high heaven, that's for sure. Removing the
> page_table_lock from being locked in ioremap, saves us from stopping
> cold during the first ioremap (at least on Power3). And as far as the
> second, I'm in complete agreement... warning warning danger will
> robinson!
That patch solved the boot problem on my 43p 260. Last progress output
was MMU:exit.
It boots and runs fine now.
Gruss Olaf
--
$ man clone
BUGS
Main feature not yet implemented...
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-30 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-28 17:18 spin_lock problem in recent kernel Kaoru Fukui
2001-03-28 19:02 ` Tom Gall
2001-03-29 13:29 ` Kaoru Fukui
[not found] ` <3AC33CA7.E5DF4C03@vnet.ibm.com>
2001-03-29 21:20 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent k ernel Kaoru Fukui
2001-03-30 2:18 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent kernel Tom Gall
2001-03-30 2:16 ` Takashi Oe
2001-03-30 2:48 ` Tom Gall
2001-03-30 2:36 ` Tony Mantler
2001-03-30 3:07 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem inrecent kernel Tom Gall
2001-03-30 12:40 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2001-03-30 9:16 ` Success kernel-243pre8-SMP(patch)(Re: spin_lock problem in recent k ernel Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010330144041.A23536@suse.de \
--to=olh@suse.de \
--cc=gall@rochcivictheatre.org \
--cc=k_fukui@highway.ne.jp \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=nicoya@apia.dhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.