All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eugene B. Berdnikov" <berd@elf.ihep.su>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0.
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:28:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010411232836.C19364@elf.ihep.su> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010411223536.A19364@elf.ihep.su> <200104111904.XAA10804@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200104111904.XAA10804@ms2.inr.ac.ru>; from kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:04:04PM +0400

  Hello.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:04:04PM +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> >  In my experiments linux simply sets mss=mtu-40 at the start of ethernet
> >  connections. I do not know why, but belive it's ok. How the version of
> >  kernel and configuration options can affect mss later?
[...]
> The problem begins f.e. when mss is less and packet arrives on ethernet.
> It eats the same 1.5k of memory, but carries only ~mss bytes of tcp payload.
> See? We do not know this forward, advertise large window, have not enough
> rcvbuf to get it filled and cannot do anything but dropping new packets.

 However, I can't understand the dependency upon the kernel version, etc...

 Let me steak on this question again. In my experiments I found the
 dependency on the keepalive setting for connection on 2.2.17:

   mtu 382 + keepalive yes -> loss
   mtu 382 + keepalive no  -> ok

 I made 2 tries for each setting. Does your model of "mss/mtu bug" cover
 such a picture? If the answer is "yes", I am almost satisfied. :-)

 If this behaviour is not deterministic, and is driven by probability,
 does it mean that I can get other results with large number of tests?
-- 
 Eugene Berdnikov

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-11 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-09 14:43 Bug report: tcp staled when send-q != 0, timers == 0 Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-10 17:38 ` kuznet
2001-04-10 21:19   ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 10:16     ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 16:56       ` kuznet
2001-04-11 18:35         ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 19:04           ` kuznet
2001-04-11 19:28             ` Eugene B. Berdnikov [this message]
2001-04-11 19:37               ` kuznet
2001-04-11 16:35     ` kuznet
2001-04-11 18:50       ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-11 19:09         ` kuznet
2001-04-11 19:18           ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-13  8:54           ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
     [not found]             ` <200104181928.XAA04912@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
2001-04-21 15:45               ` Eugene B. Berdnikov
2001-04-21 17:02                 ` kuznet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010411232836.C19364@elf.ihep.su \
    --to=berd@elf.ihep.su \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.