All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <jakob@unthought.net>
To: Andreas Peter <ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SW-RAID0 Performance problems
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:01:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01041313473002.00533@debian>
In-Reply-To: <01041313473002.00533@debian>; from ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:47:30PM +0200

On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
> Hi,
> I've successfully set up SW-RAID0 with Kernel 2.4.3 and Raidtools 0.9.
> I did this to increase the performance of my HD, but nothig happens.
> The hdparm results:
> hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
> hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
> hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
> 
> I thougt the performnace of RAID0 should near 40MB/sec.
> I played with different chunk-sizes, but the result was everytime the same.
> The drives are both Maxtor DiamondMax VL40, 30GB, DMA on. 
> No other drive is attached on the bus.
> 
> Here are also some bonnie++ results:
...

I can't say much about this... It looks like your setup is perfectly allright,
and the performance *should* go up.   Instead it looks like you get a small
performance drop from using the RAID.   Most odd.

Do you have more controllers in the machine ? If so could you try to move eg.
hdc to the second controller ?  The only thing I can imagine being the cause of
the poor performance is, if your controller somehow doesn't handle both
channels very well simultaneously.   It's far fetched, but it's the only
suggestion I can think of.

Maybe Andre has comments ?

I usually get a good speedup from using RAID-0 on 2.4.3 with IDE.  Both with
two disks and with six.   This is with Intel PIIX4 and Promise 20262
controllers.

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-13 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-13 11:47 SW-RAID0 Performance problems Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 16:01 ` Jakob Østergaard [this message]
2001-04-13 16:28   ` Andreas Peter
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104131048550.1669-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-04-13 15:36 ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 16:07   ` David Rees
2001-04-13 16:28     ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-14  7:04       ` David Rees
2001-04-14  9:38         ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-14 12:28           ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-04-14 13:09             ` Andreas Peter
2001-04-13 18:11     ` Tim Moore
2001-04-14 10:45       ` Andreas Peter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010413180152.A13740@unthought.net \
    --to=jakob@unthought.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.