From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA115482A for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:41:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14pD02-0006kd-00 for parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:41:18 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:41:18 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Booting 735/99 Message-ID: <20010416184118.B18045@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <007701c0c415$3f4779a0$1401a8c0@peewee> <20010413233152.F8797@neep.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010413233152.F8797@neep.com.au>; from andrew@neep.com.au on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:31:54PM +0800 Sender: List-ID: On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 11:31:54PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > I don't think a partition table written on the i386 would be readable by > the HP box though. Actually, it is. We decided to simply adopt the x86 partition format rather than defining a new one. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.