From: "Manfred Bartz" <md-linux-kernel@logi.cc>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5
Date: 17 Apr 2001 12:37:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010417023716.7748.qmail@logi.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0104152039130.1616-100000@asdf.capslock.lan> <01041708461209.00352@workshop> <20010416020732.30431.qmail@logi.cc> <20010416224321.O16697@corellia.laforge.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: Harald Welte's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:43:21 -0300"
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 12:07:31PM +1000, Manfred Bartz wrote:
> > Resetable counters guarantee that no two programs can co-exists if
> > they happen to reset the same counters.
>
> That sounds like crap (sorry).
Care to explain how two independent apps can co-exists if they happen
to reset the same counters?
> so why are your applications resetting counters then?
Ask the authors, not me. I wiped those apps from my system.
Its just a pity about the time wasted.
> Nobody forces you to reset them right now.
Why do authors then write apps (f.e. ipac) which reset counters?
Perhaps only because they can, not because it makes sense.
--
Manfred Bartz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-17 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-16 21:53 IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 David Findlay
2001-04-16 0:21 ` Michael Clark
2001-04-16 0:40 ` Mike A. Harris
2001-04-16 22:46 ` David Findlay
2001-04-16 0:50 ` Mike A. Harris
2001-04-16 1:58 ` swds.mlowe
2001-04-16 1:24 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-16 2:07 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-16 9:43 ` Russell King
2001-04-16 22:24 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-17 10:29 ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-20 16:21 ` Counters [Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5] Harald Welte
2001-04-17 1:43 ` IP Acounting Idea for 2.5 Harald Welte
2001-04-17 2:37 ` Manfred Bartz [this message]
2001-04-17 6:56 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-04-20 16:17 ` Harald Welte
2001-04-20 21:00 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-04-16 11:21 ` Andreas Ferber
2001-04-16 2:40 ` Dax Kelson
2001-04-17 1:39 ` Harald Welte
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-16 22:35 Leif Sawyer
2001-04-16 23:42 ` Ian Stirling
2001-04-17 1:13 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-17 10:34 ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-16 23:52 Leif Sawyer
2001-04-17 12:28 Jesse Pollard
2001-04-17 16:57 Leif Sawyer
2001-04-17 18:31 Jesse Pollard
2001-04-17 19:09 Leif Sawyer
2001-04-17 19:37 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-04-18 13:49 ` Michael Clark
2001-04-17 22:32 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-17 21:25 Jesse Pollard
2001-04-17 21:48 Leif Sawyer
2001-04-17 22:58 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-17 23:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-17 23:35 ` Manfred Bartz
2001-04-18 0:02 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-20 2:51 ` Ton Hospel
2001-05-01 23:13 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-04-18 8:16 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-04-18 14:45 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-17 23:06 Leif Sawyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010417023716.7748.qmail@logi.cc \
--to=md-linux-kernel@logi.cc \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.