All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20010420195004.A5510@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 9d71a82..2abb319 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -3,3 +3,32 @@ On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
 > patches.  I'll try to stay in the mainline code and out of the port
 > trees.  Would you please do me the kindness of telling me which ones
 > can go in and which ones you think have to go through maintainers?
+
+>From my point of view, I'd be happy if stuff that touched the ARM tree
+directly was sent separately from the other architectures, and actually
+was copied to me.  I'm sure that the other architecture maintainers
+feel the same way, but I'll let them comment separately.
+
+Why?  Well:
+
+- Firstly, I can apply your patch directly to my tree without having
+  to bother about the effects in the other architecture trees.  (hence
+  when I resync with Linus or Alan, I don't have to go around fixing
+  up rejects in other architecture trees).
+
+- Secondly, its very easy to miss stuff in the lkml hunk of email each
+  day when you have less than 4 hours to read it and think about it.
+  (note that architecture maintainers have to read mail from their
+  side which may not be on lkml, think about that, think about bug fixes,
+  possible impacts of fixes on other machines, etc etc).  Therefore,
+  copying their email address registered in the MAINTAINER file means
+  that they should not overlook your patch.
+
+- I know that Alan does take lots of patches off lkml, but I'm not sure
+  what his criterion is for selecting them.  In the case which started
+  this thread off, I'm always worried that your cleanup patch would make
+  it in, and then cause me problems later on.
+
+--
+Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
+             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 2f6b507..101db5f 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -17,6 +17,35 @@
  "> All right then.  I'm going to send you a bunch of dead-symbol cleanup\n"
  "> patches.  I'll try to stay in the mainline code and out of the port\n"
  "> trees.  Would you please do me the kindness of telling me which ones\n"
- > can go in and which ones you think have to go through maintainers?
+ "> can go in and which ones you think have to go through maintainers?\n"
+ "\n"
+ ">From my point of view, I'd be happy if stuff that touched the ARM tree\n"
+ "directly was sent separately from the other architectures, and actually\n"
+ "was copied to me.  I'm sure that the other architecture maintainers\n"
+ "feel the same way, but I'll let them comment separately.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "Why?  Well:\n"
+ "\n"
+ "- Firstly, I can apply your patch directly to my tree without having\n"
+ "  to bother about the effects in the other architecture trees.  (hence\n"
+ "  when I resync with Linus or Alan, I don't have to go around fixing\n"
+ "  up rejects in other architecture trees).\n"
+ "\n"
+ "- Secondly, its very easy to miss stuff in the lkml hunk of email each\n"
+ "  day when you have less than 4 hours to read it and think about it.\n"
+ "  (note that architecture maintainers have to read mail from their\n"
+ "  side which may not be on lkml, think about that, think about bug fixes,\n"
+ "  possible impacts of fixes on other machines, etc etc).  Therefore,\n"
+ "  copying their email address registered in the MAINTAINER file means\n"
+ "  that they should not overlook your patch.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "- I know that Alan does take lots of patches off lkml, but I'm not sure\n"
+ "  what his criterion is for selecting them.  In the case which started\n"
+ "  this thread off, I'm always worried that your cleanup patch would make\n"
+ "  it in, and then cause me problems later on.\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux\n"
+              http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
 
-f291de8e879ea2f00a1a7327278564ccc0788202a44ad85616d0c64e66ceea7d
+eae7bc837211738804ca8082775b06626e45a5e1078605c2d66110449d1a3d85

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.