All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	"D . W . Howells" <dhowells@astarte.free-online.co.uk>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 rwsem in 2.4.4pre[234] are still buggy [was Re: rwsem benchmarks [Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]]]
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:07:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010421170735.F17757@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010420191710.A32159@athlon.random> <Pine.LNX.4.31.0104201639070.6299-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <20010421160327.A17757@athlon.random> <20010421153742.B7576@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20010421153742.B7576@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>; from rmk@arm.linux.org.uk on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0100

On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 04:45:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > I would suggest the following:
> > > 
> > >  - the generic semaphores should use the lock that already exists in the
> > >    wait-queue as the semaphore spinlock.
> > 
> > Ok, that is what my generic code does.
> 
> rwsem-spinlock.h requires linux/types.h to be included (you're using
> __u16 at towards the bottom):

As you are quoting me on "that is what my generic code does", note that my
code is only here:

	ftp://ftp.*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.4pre4aa1/00_rwsem-generic-6

and no one single line of my rwsem patches is ever been included in any of
Linus's or Alan's kernels.

> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
>  -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mapcs-32  -march=armv3m -mtune=strongarm110
>  -mshort-load-bytes -msoft-float -c -o ieee1284.o ieee1284.c
> In file included from /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/rwsem.h:56,
>                  from /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/asm/semaphore.h:10,
>                  from /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/parport.h:101,
>                  from ieee1284.c:19:
> /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h:154: parse error before `rwsem_cmpxchgw'
> /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h:154: parse error before `__u16'
> /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h:155: warning: return-type defaults to `int'
> /usr/src2/v2.4/linux-rpc/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h:155: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
> 
> Here is a patch that fixes this oversight against 2.4.4-pre5:
> 
> --- orig/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h	Sat Apr 21 15:32:57 2001
> +++ linux/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h	Sat Apr 21 15:28:45 2001
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  
> 
> 
> --
> Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
>              http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
> 


Andrea

      reply	other threads:[~2001-04-21 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-04-19 23:28 rwsem benchmarks [Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]] D.W.Howells
2001-04-20  1:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-20 10:10   ` David Howells
2001-04-20 17:17   ` x86 rwsem in 2.4.4pre[234] are still buggy [was Re: rwsem benchmarks [Re: generic rwsem [Re: Alpha "process table hang"]]] Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-20 23:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-21 14:03       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-21 14:17         ` Russell King
2001-04-21 14:29           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-21 14:37             ` rmk
2001-04-21 15:04               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-04-21 17:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-21 14:37         ` Russell King
2001-04-21 15:07           ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010421170735.F17757@athlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=dhowells@astarte.free-online.co.uk \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.