From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:36:12 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] badblocks handling with LVM Message-ID: <20010426163612.D26041@vestdata.no> References: <200104231008.f3NA8Gkx001134@webber.adilger.int> <01042519594802.31687@lyta> <20010426100603.A9820@sistina.com> <20010426152651.B26041@vestdata.no> <20010426162742.A8220@dragon.blacknet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20010426162742.A8220@dragon.blacknet.de>; from Goetz Bock on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:27:42PM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Goetz Bock wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26 '01 at 15:26, Ragnar Kj�rstad wrote: > > And if anyone insist on using LVM to mark the blocks anyway, it can be > > done with out special code. Just create a volume named "broken", and put > > the PVs in question in this. > That would be a waste of space, my PVs are all 10+GB in size, I'd like > bad block handling on PE level not on PV level. > But I can live with out badblock handling in LVM. Sorry, I meant "put the PEs in question in this". (it doesn't actually do anything, just mark that space as used, so you won't accidently put something else there) -- Ragnar Kj�rstad Big Storage