From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>,
Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:23:47 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010503222347.A26495@metastasis.f00f.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010503205754.A26313@metastasis.f00f.org> <E14vFjM-0005Gx-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E14vFjM-0005Gx-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:49:02AM +0100
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:49:02AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
No collisions. There are other good reasons you dont want to do
forks on files that way (you need to enumerate them but if you
make them directories all hell breaks loose).
Hmm... so how else do you support n-forks cleanly preserving existing
semantics? I'm not sure I like Linus' suggestion, but I can't think
of anything better.
--cw
(On the whole, I think forks are horrible enough that we shouldn't
encourage them further than we do already with .AppleDouble, and
similar solutions... but, opinions vary greatly here)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-03 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-24 21:02 [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer Matt_Domsch
2001-04-24 21:59 ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-24 23:16 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-04-27 4:31 ` Richard Gooch
2001-04-27 5:24 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-05-01 1:27 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-01 8:46 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-01 16:53 ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-01 20:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-02 15:03 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-02 15:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-03 8:57 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-05-03 9:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-03 10:23 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2001-05-01 14:38 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-05-03 7:32 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-03 7:51 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-05-11 16:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-11 22:49 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-05-11 23:00 ` Steven Willoughby
2001-05-12 2:20 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-05-12 4:21 ` Jonathan Lundell
[not found] <p0510030db7221c090810@[10.128.7.49]=FE2>
2001-05-12 11:00 ` Kai Henningsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010503222347.A26495@metastasis.f00f.org \
--to=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=jlundell@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.