From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 08:19:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 08:19:22 -0400 Received: from smarty.smart.net ([207.176.80.102]:10515 "EHLO smarty.smart.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 08:19:03 -0400 From: Rick Hohensee Message-Id: <200105061221.IAA29984@smarty.smart.net> Subject: Re: inserting a Forth-like language into the Linux kernel To: acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan) Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 08:21:26 -0400 (EDT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200105060652.f466qwH316756@saturn.cs.uml.edu> from "Albert D. Cahalan" at May 06, 2001 02:52:57 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > I don't know about H1 S&M, but the ability to open a tty > > normally directly into kernelspace may prove popular, particularly > > with a Forth on that tty in that kernelspace. Persons with actual > > With anything other than Forth, LISP, and COBOL... yes. Nice little sensibility scale for kspamd-like things, Forth 1.0 Lisp 0.5 COBOL 0.0 > > > If someone knows of another example of interpreter-like behavior > > directly in a unix in-kernel thread I'd like to know about it. > > kdb > That runs in trap handlers doesn't it? I don't think it's a kernel daemon. Rick Hohensee www.clienux.com