From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 16:31:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 16:31:19 -0400 Received: from smarty.smart.net ([207.176.80.102]:1291 "EHLO smarty.smart.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 6 May 2001 16:31:11 -0400 From: Rick Hohensee Message-Id: <200105062033.QAA08440@smarty.smart.net> Subject: Re: inserting a Forth-like language into the Linux kernel To: randy.dunlap@intel.com (Dunlap, Randy) Date: Sun, 6 May 2001 16:33:37 -0400 (EDT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Dunlap, Randy" at May 06, 2001 09:32:31 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > If someone knows of another example of interpreter-like behavior > > > > directly in a unix in-kernel thread I'd like to know about it. > > > > > > kdb > > > > > > > That runs in trap handlers doesn't it? I don't think it's a > > kernel daemon. > > and there's the hangman-in-kernel patch... > interpreter or daemon or app-in-system-space ??? Thanks, I'll look for that. Rick Hohensee > > ~Randy >