All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl (Rogier Wolff)
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
	Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:39:29 +0200 (MEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200105111039.MAA18522@cave.bitwizard.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010511123257.A6023@gruyere.muc.suse.de> from Andi Kleen at "May 11, 2001 12:32:57 pm"

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:21:59PM +0000, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> > When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use
> > 
> > #ifdef skb_shinfo
> 
> Yes I forgot that RedHat already shipped it :-(
> 
> > This gives you maximal backward compatibility, as all public zerocopy
> > patches contain this macro. Only thing is that Dave has to remember
> > that when he turns skb_shinfo into inline function, an identity #define have
> > to be added.
> 
> No such guarantee for binary only software ;)

Right. I therefore refuse to maintain binary modules for my
clients. This usually convinces them to release source code.

But it's always been said that source code compatiblity would be
maintained. I'm a bit pissed that people just go about changing public
source-level interfaces. 

				Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2137555 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
* There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots. 
* There are also old, bald pilots. 

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-11 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-11 12:21 Source code compatibility in Stable series???? Petr Vandrovec
2001-05-11 10:32 ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 10:39   ` Rogier Wolff [this message]
2001-05-11 10:44     ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 10:52       ` Rogier Wolff
2001-05-11 11:19       ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 11:19     ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 11:16 ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-11 13:08 Petr Vandrovec
2001-05-11  9:47 Rogier Wolff
2001-05-11  9:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-11 10:03   ` Andi Kleen
2001-05-11 11:13     ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200105111039.MAA18522@cave.bitwizard.nl \
    --to=r.e.wolff@bitwizard.nl \
    --cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.