From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 17:06:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 17:06:22 -0400 Received: from oss.sgi.com ([216.32.174.190]:57356 "EHLO oss.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 11 May 2001 17:06:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:32:42 -0300 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jonathan Lundell Cc: Kai Henningsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer Message-ID: <20010511133242.B3224@bacchus.dhis.org> In-Reply-To: <80BTbI6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jlundell@pobox.com on Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:51:25AM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:51:25AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: > >What's a lot more important is that the mail standards say that this stuff > >should not be interpreted by the receivers as needing wrapping, so > >irregardless of good or bad design it's just plain illegal. > > > >If you want to support wrapping with plain text, investigate > >format=flowed. > > Yes, I did that. > > I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid > receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail clients do it. > What's the relevant RFC? RFC 2822, 2.1.1. Ralf