From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:53:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:53:16 -0400 Received: from mailhost.tue.nl ([131.155.2.5]:33336 "EHLO mailhost.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 May 2001 19:53:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20010513015310.A7635@win.tue.nl> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 01:53:10 +0200 From: Guest section DW To: Anton Altaparmakov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux support for Microsoft dynamic disks? In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010513000214.00ab3810@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010513000214.00ab3810@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>; from Anton Altaparmakov on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:06:03AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:06:03AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Is anyone working on supporting the dynamic disk format introduced with > Windows 2000? If not, does anyone have the specs / any detailed info on the > on disk structures involved? I once collected some stuff from the Microsoft Knowledge Base. In http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types-1.html (hint: additions and corrections are welcome!) you find partition type 42 that marks a partition table as legacy. Unfortunately I do not have Windows 2000. (But I have DOS 4.01 :-) Andries