From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 06:46:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 06:46:16 -0400 Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.2.7]:30068 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 06:46:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20010513124606.A7758@win.tue.nl> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 12:46:06 +0200 From: Guest section DW To: "Jeff V. Merkey" , Anton Altaparmakov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux support for Microsoft dynamic disks? In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010513000214.00ab3810@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20010512203445.A4194@vger.timpanogas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: <20010512203445.A4194@vger.timpanogas.org>; from Jeff V. Merkey on Sat, May 12, 2001 at 08:34:45PM -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 08:34:45PM -0600, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > What is your specific question? Well, my specific question would be: enough information to support mounting filesystems that live on a dynamic disk. Andries