From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 19:18:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 19:17:57 -0400 Received: from f00f.stub.clear.net.nz ([203.167.224.51]:2825 "HELO metastasis.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 May 2001 19:17:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:17:39 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Alan Cox Cc: David Woodhouse , "David S. Miller" , Andrea Arcangeli , Mauelshagen@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mge@sistina.com, hch@caldera.de Subject: Re: LVM 1.0 release decision Message-ID: <20010514111739.A11330@metastasis.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <23605.989775371@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:39:36PM +0100 X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:39:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: Or the 32bit libc shipped with the 64bit box. Lets face it, there is no reason you can't have a 32bit glibc 2.2 built to use 64bit calling conventions.. It doesn't work with binary compatability form other sources (e.g. trying to run SunOS binaries under ultralinux and such like (I assume this is possible?)). Then again, should SunOS binaries really be making such ioctls? --cw