From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4F1FvM28933 for linux-mips-outgoing; Mon, 14 May 2001 18:15:57 -0700 Received: from dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4F1FpF28928 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 18:15:53 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4F15Zx14778; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:05:35 -0300 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:05:35 -0300 From: Ralf Baechle To: Matthew Dharm Cc: Linux-MIPS Subject: Re: PATCH: Momentum Computer Ocelot: Making the latest CVS tree build Message-ID: <20010514220535.D9945@bacchus.dhis.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mdharm@momenco.com on Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:35:43PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 04:35:43PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Attached is a patch against the latest CVS tree (as of about 3 hours > ago). It makes the Momentum Computer Ocelot board build again -- > apparently, some of the PCI code has been changed. Except your patch doesn't even touch the PCI but interrupt code. > It seems likely to me that this is not the best way to do this > patch... if it's unacceptable to the powers that be (Ralf?), could > someone point out to me the new convention for board-specific PCI > initialization? Applied, but without the two extra junk segment in the patch. Ralf