From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 23:05:11 +0200 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] successes & resizing Message-ID: <20010516230511.A25665@colombina.comedia.it> References: <200105161655.f4GGtrHQ007080@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200105161655.f4GGtrHQ007080@webber.adilger.int>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:55:53AM -0600 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:55:53AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Todd Underwood writes: > > i have a separate question about ext2 resizing on a separate system: when > > i try to resize the root (using the ext2online resize patch to 2.4.3) i > > get: ... > > bash-2.04# e2fsadm -L +200M / > > e2fsadm -- invalid logical volume name "/dev/root" > > That is because in /proc/mounts, "/" is pointing to "/dev/root". Sorry, > not much I can do about that - you need to specify the real device name > for root. curious, my /proc/mounts is correct wrt device names i have: [vc/2]root@Moskowskaya:~# cat /proc/mounts /dev/vg01/lvol1 / ext2 rw 0 0 .... could this be due to the LVM_HD_NAME that was rejected from the kernel some time ago? L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \