From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:28:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:28:41 -0400 Received: from moe.unleashed.org ([216.86.199.34]:31751 "HELO mail.unleashed.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:28:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 07:28:23 -0700 From: Leah Cunningham To: ps Cc: Pim Zandbergen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RH 7.1 on IBM xSeries 240 Message-ID: <20010517072823.A43159@unleashed.org> In-Reply-To: <3B03A835.3DD48BDC@rzeczpospolita.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <3B03A835.3DD48BDC@rzeczpospolita.pl>; from ps@rzeczpospolita.pl on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:30:13PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - > > >Yes, I have the newest BIOS and SR Firmware. - > > >I have 2 x 1GHz CPUs and IBM PCI ServeRAID 4.71.00 - > - > Firmware is 4.70.17, I'v got it directly from IBM engineer. - > Previous firmware (2 days ago) was really 4.50 but it performed worse - > (was less stable in performance). That makes a bit more sense. This code is stil in test, however. Previously you said 4.71.00. - > > There is, however a driver version 4.72 in the latest 2.4.4-ac - > > kernels. - > - > I've tried it but it was all the same - I came back to 4.71 It still seems like a BIOS issue. Does is work on a default RH installation, with the RH included kernel? I can't believe it's not UNIX!!! ------------------------------------------------------------ Leah Cunningham | SuSE Expert, NOS Engineer, Undisclosed Address | QA & Linux geek, et al.