From: Sean Hunter <sean@dev.sportingbet.com>
To: Sasi Peter <sape@iq.rulez.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux scalability?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010518091711.B26232@dev.sportingbet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e2ekt$3ua$1@cesium.transmeta.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105180914560.29042-100000@iq.rulez.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105180914560.29042-100000@iq.rulez.org>; from sape@iq.rulez.org on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:24:48AM +0200
Why would you want to run a web server with 8 processors rather than four
webservers with 2 each?
Sean
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:24:48AM +0200, Sasi Peter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am just writing an essay, an have mentioned TUX as a performance and
> scalability linearity recort holder with TUX, referencing the specweb99
> website summary page:
>
> http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/web99.html
>
> However, taking a closer look, it turns out, that the above statement
> holds true only for 1 and 2 processor machines. Scalability already
> suffers at 4 processors, and at 8 processors, TUX 2.0 (7500) gets beaten
> by IIS 5.0 (8001), and these were measured on the same kind of box!
>
> How come, TUX is soooo good at the lowend (1 and 2 CPUs), and scales this
> bad?
>
> --
> SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:sape@sch.hu - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-18 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-18 20:24 Linux OS boilerplate Scott Long
2001-02-18 20:32 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-18 21:46 ` TeknoDragon
2001-02-19 1:47 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 10:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-02-22 1:24 ` Tim Wright
2001-02-19 9:03 ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-02-20 4:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-18 6:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-05-18 7:24 ` Linux scalability? Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 8:12 ` reiser.angus
2001-05-18 8:30 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-05-18 8:30 ` reiser.angus
2001-05-18 9:05 ` Ronald Bultje
2001-05-18 19:28 ` [OT] " J Sloan
2001-05-18 19:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 19:46 ` Peter Rival
2001-05-18 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 20:06 ` Peter Rival
2001-05-18 20:13 ` David S. Miller
2001-05-18 21:36 ` J Sloan
2001-05-19 8:26 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-18 8:17 ` Sean Hunter [this message]
2001-05-18 21:18 ` Rodger Donaldson
2001-05-19 8:31 ` Sasi Peter
2001-05-21 10:42 ` Sean Hunter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-18 18:07 Dan Kegel
2001-05-21 14:25 Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010518091711.B26232@dev.sportingbet.com \
--to=sean@dev.sportingbet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sape@iq.rulez.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.