From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D93482A for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:41:38 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 151yM6-0000bZ-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:40:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:40:50 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Paul Bame Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, bame@www.riverrock.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] More unaligned references Message-ID: <20010521234050.J23718@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20010521225006.I23718@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from bame@riverrock.org on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:27:07PM -0600 Sender: List-ID: On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:27:07PM -0600, Paul Bame wrote: > FYI in case others run across it, this was discovered to be the ".plt-1" bug. > To find out, use 'objdump -h' to figure out where .plt is loaded. Then add > 0x4800 plus 0xfb plus the dp register (r27). If that's .plt-1 you've found > the bug which is/should-be squashed in recent bits. Not convinced. Yes, this is in fact .plt-1. However, that bug is supposed to be both fixed in this version of binutils and an assert added to catch it happening. However, no assert is being tripped. FWIW, the offending caller is: 1d0: eb e0 00 00 b,l 1d8 ,r31 1d0: R_PARISC_PCREL17F $$dyncall -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.