All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, helgehaf@idb.hist.no,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] struct char_device
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:35:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010524113539.K27177@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200105231334.PAA86145.aeb@vlet.cwi.nl> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105231351360.20269-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105231351360.20269-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>; from viro@math.psu.edu on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:54:15PM -0400

Hi,

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:54:15PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> 
> > > But I don't want an initrd.
> > Don't be afraid of words. You wouldnt notice - it would do its
> > job and disappear just like piggyback today.
> 
> Andries, initrd code is _sick_. Our boot sequence is not a wonder of
> elegance, but that crap is the worst part. I certainly can understand
> people not wanting to use that on aesthetical reasons alone.

It's the principle of a kernel-linked boot image, not initrd, which is
important.  Unpacking a cramfs image from an __init section is much
cleaner than initrd and has almost the same effect: the boot
filesystem just ends up readonly that way.  Either way we can hook
in that default user-space code at boot time transparently.

--Stephen

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-24 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-23 13:34 [PATCH] struct char_device Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23 17:54 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-24 10:35   ` Stephen C. Tweedie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-23 20:01 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23 18:28 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23 18:42 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23 15:24 Wayne.Brown
2001-05-23 12:29 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23 12:30 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-23 13:26 ` Helge Hafting
2001-05-23 11:57 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23 12:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-23  6:47 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23  0:28 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23  0:38 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23  0:22 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23  0:29 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-23  0:20 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23  2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-23  0:01 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-22 23:33 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-23  0:03 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 22:17 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-22 22:34 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-22 22:47 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-23  0:02   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-23  0:14     ` Jens Axboe
2001-05-23  2:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-23 12:35       ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-22 21:35 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-22 22:00 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-22 20:54 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-22 21:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-05-22 22:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 23:51   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23  0:06     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-23  0:14       ` Jens Axboe
2001-05-23  2:37       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-23  3:04         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-23  3:21           ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-23  9:05         ` Alan Cox
2001-05-23  2:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 19:52 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-22 20:10 ` Alexander Viro
     [not found] <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105221007460.15685-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu >
2001-05-22 15:26 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-05-22 16:08   ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 16:12     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 17:30       ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 17:41         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 19:22     ` Guest section DW
2001-05-22 19:25       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22 19:38       ` Oliver Xymoron
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10105221050080.8984-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2001-05-22 14:59 ` Tommy Hallgren
2001-05-22 14:40 Tommy Hallgren
2001-05-22 14:18 Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010524113539.K27177@redhat.com \
    --to=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=helgehaf@idb.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.