From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
tori@unhappy.mine.nu, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net #9
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 00:28:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010531002837.B21681@bug.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200105300048.CAA04583@green.mif.pg.gda.pl> <20010529180420.A14639@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <3B14493E.63F861E7@mandrakesoft.com> <20010529182506.A14727@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010529182506.A14727@bougret.hpl.hp.com>; from Jean Tourrilhes on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:25:06PM -0700
Hi!
> > This is standard kernel cleanup that makes the resulting image smaller.
> > These patches have been going into all areas of the kernel for quite
> > some time.
>
> This doesn't make it right.
Well... It does. Code should be uniform. You may like
if (
x == y
) {
printf(
"ahoj"
);
}
style of indentation, but it is not okay in kernel.
> Ok, while we are on the topic : could somebody explain me why
> we can't get gcc to do that for us ? What is preventing adding a gcc
int xyzzy;
goes to BSS, while
int xyzzy = 0
goes to DATA. That is important for some folks.
> command line flag to do exactly that ? It's not like rocket science
> (simple test) and would avoid to have tediously to go through all
It is actually not *so* easy to do it in gcc; there's patch, however.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-31 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-30 0:48 [PATCH] net #9 Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-05-30 1:04 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 1:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 1:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 1:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 2:01 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 2:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 2:25 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 16:35 ` Hermann Himmelbauer
2001-05-30 2:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2001-05-30 2:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-30 9:33 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 22:28 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2001-05-30 9:32 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 10:28 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2001-05-30 10:30 ` Keith Owens
2001-05-30 10:43 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-05-30 10:30 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010531002837.B21681@bug.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ankry@green.mif.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tori@unhappy.mine.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.