From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <187af5f55d873a942f63a4b03d540827@interlinx.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:01:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
Message-ID: <20010604190123.C2560@pc.ilinx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010604092142.A734@minime.sistina.com>
From: "Brian J. Murrell" <lvm@interlinx.bc.ca>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:21:42AM -0500, Ben Lutgens wrote:
> 
> Just curious, /boot only needs to be like 100 megs tops why would you want
> that to be an LV. Isn't it more trouble than it's worth?

If nothing else, how about "on principle"?  :-)  Seriously though, I
want to abandon screwing around with MS-DOS partitions and use LVs
instead.  They just make so much better sense than partitions.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell