All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@transmeta.com>
Cc: Jeff Golds <jgolds@resilience.com>, Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.6-pre3
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:51:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010614095152.Y13678@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B27DE0E.84025F41@resilience.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10106132305450.1433-100000@nobelium.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10106132305450.1433-100000@nobelium.transmeta.com>; from mochel@transmeta.com on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:49PM -0700

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 899 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:49PM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> First off, the patch went into a pre-release of the kernel. Never would I
> trust a pre-release to be stable.

The issue is that of interface stability, as I'm sure you know.

> Second of all, if you look at the big picture, you may see the benefit in
> the change that was made. There is an effort to make Linux support power
> management, both at the system-wide level and at the driver level, in a
> much better way than it ever has. These changes are a manifestation of
> that effort. 

I've no doubt that new and better functions were necessary: but
couldn't it have been done in a source-compatible way?  New functions
rather than changed ones?

> Thirdly, these functions are rarely used.

Not every single driver is in Linus' tree.

I didn't see a feature-test macro either: did I miss it?

Tim.
*/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-14  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-13  1:42 Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Linus Torvalds
2001-06-13  2:40 ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Keith Owens
2001-06-13  2:48   ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Jeff Garzik
2001-06-13  9:05     ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Tim Waugh
2001-06-13  2:49   ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Patrick Mochel
2001-06-13 21:41     ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Jeff Golds
2001-06-14  6:39       ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Patrick Mochel
2001-06-14  8:51         ` Tim Waugh [this message]
2001-06-14 12:47         ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 18:02   ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Alan Cox
2001-06-14 21:39     ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 Linus Torvalds
2001-06-13 21:11 ` Linux-2.4.6-pre3 José Luis Domingo López

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010614095152.Y13678@redhat.com \
    --to=twaugh@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=jgolds@resilience.com \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.