From: David Monniaux <monniaux_nospam@arbouse.ens.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: more on VIA 686B (trials)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:44:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010614194402.A19960@picsou.chatons> (raw)
Due to a catastrophic fan short-circuit, I was forced to exchange my
686A-based motherboard for a 686B. Bad idea!
The 686A MB (MSI-6330 aka K7T-Pro) worked perfectly well: no crashes,
UDMA 66. It accepted Athlon-optimized kernels.
The 686B MB (K7T-Lite) crashed if used with DMA (any kind - mdma0 to UDMA100),
whatever version of the "VIA fixes" was in place.
Furthermore, upgrading to BIOS 2.7 (instead of 2.5), including a so-called
"SB Live fix", made the system permanently unstable.
On top of that, running an Athlon-optimized kernel (whether or not it
was compile with =march=i686 (egcs-1.1.2) or -march=athlon (gcc 2.96)
immediately oops and crash during /etc/rc!
I replaced this mobo+Duron with an ASUS A7V133+Athlon, which
work perfectly well.
Athlon-optimized kernel, UDMA100, no problem whatsoever.
So we have two kinds of problems:
- *certain* 686B motherboards crash if used with an Athlon kernel
(and it does not depend on the compiler options, rather on hand-made
Athlon optimizations)
- *certain* 686B motherboards will crash if used with any kind of DMA
under heavy disk access
- some 686B motherboards have absolutely no problem.
Crash test:
for i in `seq 1 30` ; do echo $i; tar xfz X410src-1.tgz ; rm -rf xc; done
All the above is valid for kernel version 2.4.2-RedHat to 2.4.5ac9...
Another lesson: the MSI K7T-Lite is absolute crap. The manual sucks,
and the BIOS upgrades supposed to make the machine stabler actually
make it randomly hiccup (EVEN under Windows, which is what I suppose
those mobos are supposed to run).
--
David Monniaux http://www.di.ens.fr/~monniaux
Laboratoire d'informatique de l'École Normale Supérieure,
Paris, France
next reply other threads:[~2001-06-14 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-14 17:44 David Monniaux [this message]
2001-06-14 18:11 ` more on VIA 686B (trials) Rachel Greenham
2001-06-14 18:11 ` Cory Watson
2001-06-14 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-14 18:29 ` Cory Watson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010614194402.A19960@picsou.chatons \
--to=monniaux_nospam@arbouse.ens.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.