From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jdomingo@crosswinds.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 22:51:53 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= <jdomingo@internautas.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 1.0 release schedule
Message-ID: <20010620225153.D1776@dardhal.mired.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20010620172013.A25559@sistina.com>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Wednesday, 20 June 2001, at 17:20:13 +0200,
Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:

> 
> Because we are investigating a snapshot allocation offset bug,
> we are planning to release LVM 1.0 on Friday.
> 
Will this 1.0 release be integrated into the mainstream Linux kernel
(2.4.6 I suppose) ?. Or will it be necessary to continue applying patches
for a while ?

Greetings, and good job !

--
Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez
Linux Registered User #189436     Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM)
 
jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org  => � Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias
jdomingo AT internautas DOT   org  => Spam at your own risk