From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
Cc: James A Griffin <agriffin@cpcug.org>,
Ramsey Wally Contr AFRL/IFEB <Wally.Ramsey@rl.af.mil>,
"'NSA SELinux Mailing List'" <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: Linux and Posix compliance
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:30:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010717003057.A8279@caldera.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hewcprcs.fsf@otr.mynet>; from drepper@redhat.com on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:10:43PM -0700
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:10:43PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> James A Griffin <agriffin@cpcug.org> writes:
>
> > One thing that I have noticed for years is the boot time message "POSIX
> > conformance testing by UNIFIX". The message appears just after the CPU
> > testing and before the PCI: Probe. UNIFIX is a UK company, IIRC. What
> > the results of the "conformance testing" are, I do not know.
>
> I think (and hope) they've finally removed this output. It never was
> true and is anyway completely outdated.
It's still there. And though it is outdated I bet it was once right.
> There hasn't been any formal POSIX testing done. The reason is
> simple: who'd pay this?
UNIFIX, as the message shows. UNIFIX is (or was?) a German Linux
distributor, located in Braunschwieg (100km from my home, so I could
take a look if no one believes in this ;)).
In 1995 or 1996 they sold a UNIFIX 2.0 distribution which was heavily
modified not only to pass the posix.1 and posix.2 (IIRC) conformance
test, but also too look more sysvish (I remeber yhey modified e.g.
ps to take ps -elf for long output instead of ps aux).
Christoph
--
Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX.
--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the selinux list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-16 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-16 18:02 Linux and Posix compliance Ramsey Wally Contr AFRL/IFEB
2001-07-16 18:49 ` James A Griffin
2001-07-16 20:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-07-16 22:11 ` James A Griffin
2001-07-16 22:30 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-16 21:02 Weaver, Mike D (N-CSC)
2001-07-16 21:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
[not found] <5.0.2.1.2.20010717000846.01f728e0@mail00708.popserver.pop.net>
2001-07-17 8:12 ` Andrew Josey
[not found] <5.0.2.1.2.20010717000931.01f74680@mail00708.popserver.pop.net>
2001-07-17 8:26 ` Andrew Josey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010717003057.A8279@caldera.de \
--to=hch@caldera.de \
--cc=Wally.Ramsey@rl.af.mil \
--cc=agriffin@cpcug.org \
--cc=drepper@cygnus.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.