From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ragnark@stine.vestdata.no>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:58:44 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= <lvm@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] FW: LVM on Linux
Message-ID: <20010717015844.N14564@vestdata.no>
References: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A643423@AUSMAIL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A643423@AUSMAIL>; from Gonyou, Austin on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:26:50PM -0500
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:26:50PM -0500, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. I didn't see the start of this thread I don't
> think, If I did, I was out to lunch.:) 
> At any rate the 32/64 bit numbering issue is explained very well here, and
> there is more commentary over on the XFS list too. 
> Another thing is also that I believe people are already using Fibre storage
> with LVM. No? Anyone?

Yes.



-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage