From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:18:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010723161804.C822@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010723013416.B23517@athlon.random> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231113150.27373-100000@chaos.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231113150.27373-100000@chaos.tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>; from kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:25:23AM +0200
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 11:25:23AM +0200, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> Hmmh, wait a second. I take it that means calling netif_rx not from
> hard-irq context, but e.g. from bh is a bug? (Even if the only consequence
No it isn't a bug either, calling it from irq or bh is perfectly fine
w.r.t. softirq latency. If you post it from softirq ksoftirqd will
handle the overflow event exactly like in net_rx_action.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-22 20:44 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness Rusty Russell
2001-07-22 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 9:06 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 12:05 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-23 14:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 14:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-24 9:35 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-25 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 20:26 ` Rusty Russell
2001-07-23 9:25 ` Kai Germaschewski
2001-07-23 11:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-23 14:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-07-23 22:24 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-25 22:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-26 17:46 ` kuznet
2001-07-26 18:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-26 18:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 16:48 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 0:47 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 15:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-27 18:31 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 18:59 ` kuznet
2001-07-27 19:21 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 19:35 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 0:52 ` [PATCH] [IMPORTANT] " Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-28 17:41 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 18:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:02 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 19:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 23:28 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-29 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-29 17:52 ` kuznet
2001-07-30 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-07-30 22:47 ` Nigel Gamble
2001-07-30 22:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-07-31 18:08 ` kuznet
2001-07-28 17:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-28 19:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-30 18:32 ` Maksim Krasnyanskiy
2001-07-27 9:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-07-27 17:01 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010723161804.C822@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.