From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f6OBO5W02197 for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 04:24:05 -0700 Received: from dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (u-241-10.karlsruhe.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.10.241]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6OBO1O02188 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 04:24:01 -0700 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f6OBNcQ26196; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:23:38 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:23:38 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Martin Schulze Cc: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Question about ioctls.h Message-ID: <20010724132338.A26049@bacchus.dhis.org> References: <20010724010342.R31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> <20010724012757.A4953@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010724015611.A10007@bacchus.dhis.org> <20010724100418.W31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010724100418.W31470@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>; from joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:04:18AM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:04:18AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > Could somebody try to explain this to me? I'm especially interested > > > > in the #if part. Why isn't tIOC defined normally? It is used later. > > > > in the file - and it is used externally by rp-pppoe for example. > > > > > > Overly paranoid attempt at keeping the namespace cleaner than Mr Proper > > > himself. > > > > Try the patch below. > > Thanks, looks good and works well. Somebody should commit it. I immediately commited it for both 2.2 and 2.4, mips and mips64. You can follow the commits on the linux-cvs@oss.sgi.com mailing lists. Just subscribe via Majordomo. Ralf