From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:39:38 +0100 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Some ideas regarding snapshots (was: Reiserfs, 2.4.7, snapshots w/ 0.9) Message-ID: <20010726133938.A723@btconnect.com> References: <20010725103640.J5363@unirez.com> <01072511465701.00921@exodus> <20010726135514.B26425@tiger.bigcats.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010726135514.B26425@tiger.bigcats.invalid>; from weissel@netcologne.de on Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:55:14PM +0200 From: Joe Thornber Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 01:55:14PM +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg wrote: > Iain Campbell (iain@sandon.ca) wrote 64 lines: > > Quote from Teigland and Mauelshagens's Volume Manager whitepaper: > > > journalled file system. These operations (fsck or journal replay) require > > writing to the snapshot ligical volume, which is not allowed." > > On a related subject: would it be possible to have a writable > snapshot (probably a 'reverse' snapshot)? Writeable snapshot's are easy to implement, I believe someone has already made a patch for the current LVM series (search the list). I certainly intend putting it into the experimental LVM branch soon. - Joe