From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:02:45 -0400 From: Jason Tackaberry Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Nasty bug in lvm and/or md and/or reiserfs Message-ID: <20010727090245.A4262@linux.com> References: <20010726131928.D1779@linux.com> <20010726134732.A27706@sistina.com> <20010726160701.H1779@linux.com> <20010726151725.A28574@sistina.com> <15201.4293.260605.275782@rigel.oswf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15201.4293.260605.275782@rigel.oswf.de>; from john@oswf.de on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 08:57:09AM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > I cannot comment on reiserfs, because I only use it on my equipment for > test reasons, but I have LVM on top of a RAID-5 and a RAID-0 up and running I guess you mean software RAID using md? > for more than 140 days on one of our machines. No problems so far, although > it is still 0.9.1-beta5 and a "rather old" kernel ;-). Maybe it is time to > upgrade this one, too. I guess this is the concern: md clearly works when all is going well, but when somethings goes awry (like, for example, in my case where a kernel bug in reiserfs caused umount to segfault while it had a lock on /etc/mtab), is it robust enough? Are there others on this list who can share their md/lvm experiences use with me? Thanks, Jason.