From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:06:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:06:37 -0400 Received: from ns.hobby.nl ([212.72.224.8]:8463 "EHLO hgatenl.hobby.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 09:06:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 13:42:44 +0200 From: toon@vdpas.hobby.nl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.7ac4 Message-ID: <20010804134244.C6809@vdpas.hobby.nl> In-Reply-To: <20010803015011.A8212@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010803015011.A8212@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>; from laughing@shared-source.org on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:50:11AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 01:50:11AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ > > Intermediate diffs are available from > http://www.bzimage.org > > * > * Treat this one with a bit of care. The ext3 code I trust, the -ac > * code I trust but the merge of the two could always include suprises > * Did you really merge ext3 into release 2.4.7ac4? The release notes that accompanied your announcement didn't say so... [...long list of release notes deleted from this message...]