From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 23:47:39 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM with multi-path disks? Message-ID: <20010805234739.B30768@vestdata.no> References: <3B6B30C4.B4427F3D@cup.hp.com> <20010804174049.B564@colombina.comedia.it> <20010805022800.A26419@vestdata.no> <20010805110607.A29329@caldera.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20010805110607.A29329@caldera.de>; from Christoph Hellwig on Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 11:06:07AM +0200 Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-lvm@sistina.com On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 11:06:07AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 02:28:01AM +0200, Ragnar Kj=EF=BF=BDrstad wrote: > > E.g. you have a md0 device consisting of sda and sdb - would not lvm > > find three different paths to the same data (sda, sdb, md0) when > > scanning for physical volumes? Will that not cause problems? >=20 > vgscan skips devices that are identified as md devices, so you will > not see sda and sdb but just md0. Multipath is not different from > 'normal' RAID in this respect. Hmm, I didn't think md devices needed superblocks thus could not be identified? --=20 Ragnar Kjorstad Big Storage