From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 05:45:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 05:45:15 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:53648 "EHLO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 05:45:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:46:02 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , David Luyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: /proc//maps growing... Message-ID: <20010806214601.B23464@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <997080081.3938.28.camel@typhaon> <20010806105904.A28792@athlon.random> <15214.24938.681121.837470@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15214.24938.681121.837470@pizda.ninka.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:20:42AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: I think he's right. The old code was trying to do everything and made the locking more difficult than it needed to be. I just posted an analysis of this (a bit nebulous and hand-waving in nature) which seems to indicate to me this _can_ probably be fixed in userspace, specifically glibc. Not not that I've checked the glibc code recently... < .... wanders off to try to grok glibc .... > --cw