From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:35:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:35:19 -0400 Received: from ntt-connection.daiwausa.com ([210.175.188.3]:28731 "EHLO ead42.ead.dsa.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:35:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:34:59 -0400 From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." To: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl Cc: Oliver Neukum , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: using bug reports on vendor kernels Message-ID: <20010809173459.A24128@ead45> In-Reply-To: <01080923020201.04501@idun> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from arjan@fenrus.demon.nl on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:15:08PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:15:08PM +0100, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl wrote: > In article <01080923020201.04501@idun> you wrote: > > > is there a site that would allow me to browse a list of patches added to > > vendor kernels (esp. RedHat). I need this to use an oops supplied by a user. > > I mostly documented the patches in the Red Hat Linux 7.1 default kernel > (2.4.2-2) at > > http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/patches.html > > But as this was a fair amount of work which nobody seemed to want, I haven't > actually finished nor done the same for later released kernels.... The real question is why not include the documentation with the patch? As Linus will probably tell you, patch is pretty smart about stripping out stray commentary, e.g., patch -p1 < ~/mail/apply Regards, Bill Rugolsky