From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ragnark@stine.vestdata.no>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 22:16:50 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= <lvm@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Writing forward compatible applications using /proc
Message-ID: <20010812221650.A6589@vestdata.no>
References: <20010811235718.A20414@linux.com> <20010812200701.A657@btconnect.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010812200701.A657@btconnect.com>; from thornber@btconnect.com on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:07:02PM +0100
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:07:02PM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote:
> I would much rather see people wrapping the tools than using liblvm, in fact
> liblvm will probably disappear in the future.

Why will liblvm disappear? To me using a library interface seems much
nicer than wrapping applications.


-- 
Ragnar Kjorstad
Big Storage