From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: phillips@bonn-fries.net
Cc: tpepper@vato.org, f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH]
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:11:15 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010816.161115.95062340.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010816230719Z16545-1231+1256@humbolt.nl.linux.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010816144109.A5094@cb.vato.org> <20010816.153151.74749641.davem@redhat.com> <20010816230719Z16545-1231+1256@humbolt.nl.linux.org>
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 01:13:38 +0200
What is wrong with using typeof?
Users don't think about the type that way, the new macros forces them
to at least consider it for a moment.
If you must have a three argument min,
could it please be called "type_min" of similar.
We wanted people trying to use "min" and "max" with 2
args, or redefining their own, to get a compile error.
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-16 21:11 2.4.9 does not compile f5ibh
2001-08-16 21:41 ` 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] tpepper
2001-08-16 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 23:13 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-16 23:11 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2001-08-16 23:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-16 23:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-16 23:40 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0108171844000.2277-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
2001-08-17 21:58 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 1:46 ` Jeff Dike
[not found] ` <Your message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:35:02 +0100." <5.1.0.14.2.20010817002825.00b1e4e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk>
2001-08-17 1:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-17 1:49 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-17 1:53 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 2:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-17 3:55 ` Jeff Dike
2001-08-17 17:30 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-16 23:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-16 23:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 1:24 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 1:50 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 2:29 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 2:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 2:53 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 2:59 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 3:23 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 3:37 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 3:59 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 8:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-17 4:29 ` Ben LaHaise
2001-08-17 6:07 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 3:08 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 3:13 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 3:39 ` Roman Zippel
2001-08-17 3:44 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 22:10 ` 2.4.9 does not compile [better PATCH] tpepper
2001-08-16 22:21 ` 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-16 22:28 ` 2.4.9 does not compile [better PATCH] Anton Altaparmakov
2001-08-17 4:23 ` Jeff Chua
2001-08-17 1:06 ` 2.4.9 does not compile (adaptec new driver) Luigi Genoni
[not found] <no.id>
2001-08-16 22:41 ` 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH] Alan Cox
2001-08-16 22:48 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 21:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-16 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-16 23:02 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0108171845570.2277-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
2001-08-17 21:59 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 23:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 9:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 9:17 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 9:25 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 21:40 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 22:09 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 22:11 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-17 23:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-17 23:38 ` David S. Miller
[not found] <Your message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:35:02 +0100." <5.1.0.14.2.20010817002825.00b1e4e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <5.1.0.14.2.20010817015007.045689b0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3B7C7846.FD9DEE68@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20010816.185319.88475216.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-17 7:30 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010816.161115.95062340.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=tpepper@vato.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.