From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:08:02 +0100 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: *** ANNOUNCEMENT *** LVM 1.0 available at www.sistina.com Message-ID: <20010816110802.B452@btconnect.com> References: <20010815185005.A32239@sistina.com> <200108151755.f7FHtmTH013535@webber.adilger.int> <20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010815231330.B27003@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:13:30PM +0200 From: Joe Thornber Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:13:30PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 11:55:48AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Saying you "need" the old versions of the installed tools to read the > > on disk data is bogus, IMNSHO. You could easily have a flag which says > > "calculate the PE offsets using the old algorithm or the new algorithm". > > Definitely. This is what I was asking for. That would be optimal. I'm going to go through all the beta releases and confirm this, but as I understand it there are not just two ways of calculating it. Otherwise yes it would be easy. - Joe