From: Ossama Othman <ossama@doc.ece.uci.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ossama@uci.edu
Subject: Re: Dual 1.7 GHz Xeon -- slow, interrupts not balance, etc
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:45:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010816154525.A11206@ece.uci.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010816145446.B7801@ece.uci.edu> <E15XVLG-0006AI-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15XVLG-0006AI-00@the-village.bc.nu>; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:18PM +0100
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the response!
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> If you look at the figures from the various benchmarking sites that doesnt
> sound unexpected. If you can recode your applications (eg if its a complex
> analysis problem) to use SSE2 and the like you may well get big speed ups
I noticed those web sites, too, which is why I'm confused as to why
I'm achieving such dismal performance.
I don't think we can take advantage of the SSE2 instruction since
we're mostly using these boxes as fast build/compile boxes.
One of the benchmark sites that I browsed through showed a 30 second
difference in kernel 2.4.2 compile times between a 1 GHz PIII a 1.7GHz
Xeon. I realize that such differences are application dependent, but
we only noticed a 10 second difference in our application (ACE/TAO).
Sometimes the PIII box was faster with the compiles, too.
I wasn't expecting a 70% increase in speed but I did expect a
noticeable performance boost rather than a equal or lesser
performance. Was I expecting too much?
> > Any ideas why CPU1 isn't getting any interrupts? Incidentally,
> > interrupts appear to be fairly well balanced on our PIII box.
>
> Do the boot messages ay anothing about this ?
To be honest, I'm not sure what I should be looking for (sorry... I'm
not a kernel hacker yet). Should I just send the boot messages (about
a 15K file)?
I do get the following from 2.4.7 boot (2.4.8 has the same messages):
IO APIC #2......
.... register #00: 02000000
....... : physical APIC id: 02
.... register #01: 00178020
....... : max redirection entries: 0017
....... : IO APIC version: 0020
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
.... register #02: 00000000
....... : arbitration: 00
.... IRQ redirection table:
NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect:
00 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
01 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39
02 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31
03 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41
04 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49
05 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51
06 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59
07 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61
08 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 69
09 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 71
0a 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79
0b 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81
0c 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 89
0d 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
0e 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 91
0f 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 99
10 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A1
11 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A9
12 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B1
13 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 B9
14 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 C1
15 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 C9
16 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 D1
17 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 D9
I'll send this stuff off to linux-smp, as stated by the message. I
also get the following (probably unrelated) messages:
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 1: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
Unknown bridge resource 2: assuming transparent
agpgart: Unsupported Intel chipset (device id: 2531), you might want
to try agp_try_unsupported=1.
agpgart: no supported devices found.
BTW, if this mailing list isn't the appropriate forum for these
issues, I'd be glad to move it to another forum. I certainly don't
want to both the community with noise.
Thanks again,
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <ossama@ece.uci.edu>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-16 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-16 21:54 Dual 1.7 GHz Xeon -- slow, interrupts not balance, etc Ossama Othman
2001-08-16 22:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-16 22:45 ` Ossama Othman [this message]
2001-08-16 22:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010816154525.A11206@ece.uci.edu \
--to=ossama@doc.ece.uci.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ossama@uci.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.