From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: "Mark H. Wood" <mwood@IUPUI.Edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext2 not NULLing deleted files?
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:09:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010817140831.H17372@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010817020241.C32617@turbolinux.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108171243410.392-100000@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108171243410.392-100000@mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu>
On Aug 17, 2001 12:55 -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> Regarding the need to do more than just zero unwanted data, I note that
> there is a U.S. DOD MIL-SPEC (no, I do not know the number) which defines
> a sequence of patterns to be used for erasing magnetic media.
In the Usenix paper quoted earlier in this thread (I believe) it was
stated that the MIL-SPEC document was actually bogus. REAL secure
deletion requirements were much more strict (something like 15 passes of
various random and non-random patterns vs. 7 passes of alternating all 0
and all 1 data), but the US government made it think that the MIL-SPEC
requirements were enough, so that naive users would follow it, still
leaving enough trace data on the disk for the government to retrieve it.
Still, even a single pass of zero writes is enough to prevent 99.9%
of attackers from getting the data back.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-17 7:38 ext2 not NULLing deleted files? Enver Haase
2001-08-17 7:47 ` Robert Love
2001-08-17 17:40 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-08-17 7:56 ` Thomas Pornin
2001-08-17 8:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-17 17:55 ` Mark H. Wood
2001-08-17 20:09 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-08-21 14:19 ` Andreas Bombe
2001-08-17 16:32 ` Marc SCHAEFER
2001-08-17 17:25 ` Andreas Dilger
[not found] <01081709381000.08800@haneman.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-08-17 8:03 ` Andi Kleen
2001-08-17 14:20 ` Kent Borg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-17 22:05 Jesse Pollard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010817140831.H17372@turbolinux.com \
--to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwood@IUPUI.Edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.