From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 11:04:42 +0100 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Problem using lvreduce Message-ID: <20010818110442.A414@btconnect.com> References: <051DFF3BBA73D3119A5800A0C95BD021C03C32@barracuda.alpha-processor.com> <20010817114344.D450@btconnect.com> <20010817114344.D450@btconnect.com> <20010817163831.A11977@sistina.com> <20010817114143.A16214@trellisinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010817114143.A16214@trellisinc.com>; from fauxpas@trellisinc.com on Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:41:43AM -0400 From: Joe Thornber Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 11:41:43AM -0400, Faux Pas III wrote: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 04:38:31PM +0200, Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote: > > > Yes, a pe index in the range of 0 to n. > > With the patch that will well result in -1 to n-1, wich is wrong. > > Since it seems settled that this patch is the Wrong Way, is there a > proper patch that addresses the problem that I can grab ? Grab 1.0.1-rc1, please mail me how you get on. - Joe