From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:13:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:12:53 -0400 Received: from mail.spylog.com ([194.67.35.220]:40601 "HELO mail.spylog.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:12:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 01:12:51 +0400 From: Andrey Nekrasov To: Linux kernel Subject: Re: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches Message-ID: <20010828011251.A32227@spylog.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Linux kernel In-Reply-To: <998877465.801.19.camel@phantasy> <20010827093835.A15153@oisec.net> <3B8AA02D.6F7561AB@lexus.com> <998941465.1993.9.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <998941465.1993.9.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i Organization: SpyLOG ltd. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Robert Love, Once you wrote about "Re: Updated Linux kernel preemption patches": > On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 15:31, J Sloan wrote: > > I get the same error - > > > > RH 7.1 + updates and bits of rawhide - > > I am looking into this, but I do not have this problem (which is odd). > > The patch wraps one define of atomic_dec_and_lock in an #ifndef > CONFIG_PREEMPT, but I assume there is another defination elsewhere. For > whatever reason, my kernel compiles fine. > > I am going to update the patch to 2.4.9-ac2, give that a try. > > Wait a second...you are _ENABLING_ the configure option, right? Always > run `make oldconfig' !!! If you are not, in this case, the patch is > breaking compiles where CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set...now I can fix that. > Please let me know. I am doing: make clean make menuconfig (load my config; enable/disable option if need) make dep make bzImage (break with error) Where should be "make oldconfig" ? -- bye. Andrey Nekrasov, SpyLOG.