From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 17:19:09 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Bug in the min and max macros in lvm-snap.c Message-ID: <20010828171909.B338@dardhal.mired.net> References: <00aa01c12fc9$5f3cda00$3300a8c0@local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <00aa01c12fc9$5f3cda00$3300a8c0@local> Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com On Tuesday, 28 August 2001, at 07:57:20 -0600, Hostmaster (www) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm installing the lvm_1.0.1-rc1 patch to a RedHat install (kernel 2.4.3-12). > > After installing the kernel patch, the kernel build was failing on the min and max macros in lvm-snap.c. > Maybe I'm wrong, but AFAIR Linus changed max and min macros on 2.4.9, so they are not backwards compatible. As lvm_1.0.1-rc1 was intended for kernel 2.4.9, I suppose it used those new max/min macros, so LVM 1.0.1-rc1 doesn't work with kernels < 2.4.9. Check last week's linux kernel mailing list archives to check what people think about this sudden change :) -- Jos� Luis Domingo L�pez Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM) jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => � Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk