All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: kevin.vanmaren@unisys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The cause of the "VM" performance problem with 2.4.X
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:25:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010829102510.I640@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <245F259ABD41D511A07000D0B71C4CBA289F5F@us-slc-exch-3.slc.unisys.com> <200108281852.f7SIqos15325@penguin.transmeta.com> <20010829102216.H640@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010829102216.H640@suse.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 717 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 29 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >  4.51    432.97    25.70 13445261     0.00     0.00  blk_get_queue
> > 
> > Now, while I don't worry about "getblk()" itself, the request stuff and
> > blk_get_queue() _can_ be quite an issue even under non-mkfs load, so
> 
> blk_get_queue() is easy to 'fix', it grabs io_request_lock for no good
> reason at all. I think this must have been a failed attempt to protect
> switching of queues, however it's obviously very broken in this regard.
> So in fact no skin is off our nose for just removing the io_request_lock
> in that path. 2.5 will have it properly reference counted...

Linus, will you take this patch to remove io_request_lock in this path?

-- 
Jens Axboe


[-- Attachment #2: blk-get-queue-lock-1 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1734 bytes --]

--- drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c~	Wed Aug 29 10:22:50 2001
+++ drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c	Wed Aug 29 10:23:12 2001
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
 	return max_sectors[MAJOR(dev)][MINOR(dev)];
 }
 
-inline request_queue_t *__blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev)
+inline request_queue_t *blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev)
 {
 	struct blk_dev_struct *bdev = blk_dev + MAJOR(dev);
 
@@ -141,22 +141,6 @@
 		return &blk_dev[MAJOR(dev)].request_queue;
 }
 
-/*
- * NOTE: the device-specific queue() functions
- * have to be atomic!
- */
-request_queue_t *blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev)
-{
-	request_queue_t *ret;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock,flags);
-	ret = __blk_get_queue(dev);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock,flags);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int __blk_cleanup_queue(struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct request *rq;
@@ -1272,7 +1256,6 @@
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_that_request_last);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_init_queue);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_get_queue);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blk_get_queue);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_cleanup_queue);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_headactive);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_make_request);
--- include/linux/blkdev.h~	Wed Aug 29 10:23:19 2001
+++ include/linux/blkdev.h	Wed Aug 29 10:23:29 2001
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@
 extern void grok_partitions(struct gendisk *dev, int drive, unsigned minors, long size);
 extern void register_disk(struct gendisk *dev, kdev_t first, unsigned minors, struct block_device_operations *ops, long size);
 extern void generic_make_request(int rw, struct buffer_head * bh);
-extern request_queue_t *blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev);
-extern inline request_queue_t *__blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev);
+extern inline request_queue_t *blk_get_queue(kdev_t dev);
 extern void blkdev_release_request(struct request *);
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-29  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-28 17:35 The cause of the "VM" performance problem with 2.4.X Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-28 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-08-28 19:29   ` André Dahlqvist
2001-08-29 13:49     ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-29  8:22   ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-29  8:25     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-23 17:26 Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-23 17:06 Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-23 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-23  1:48 Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-23 16:33 ` Andrew Morton
2001-08-22 22:23 Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-22  5:31 Van Maren, Kevin
2001-08-22 20:19 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010829102510.I640@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.vanmaren@unisys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.