From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:08:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:08:40 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:26127 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:08:28 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200109031807.WAA24987@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: Excessive TCP retransmits over lossless, high latency link To: lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk (Jamie Lokier) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:07:46 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: davem@redhat.com, ak@muc.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010903185700.A12529@thefinal.cern.ch> from "Jamie Lokier" at Sep 3, 1 06:57:00 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > Do you mean that you want to see the Linux -> Linux connection, with > tcpdumps at both ends? At the end of sender. Receiver side is not so interesting. Well, if you were able to make it with solaris this would be also interesting. It would be clear how exactly it miscalculates rtt at least. :-) But Linux is interesting too. Theoretically it should show better times even with so short transfer. cwnd stays at 1 and this is very strange. Alexey