From: antirez <antirez@invece.org>
To: Ingo Rohloff <rohloff@in.tum.de>
Cc: epic@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: epic100.c, gcc-2.95.2 compiler bug!
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:13:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010907161323.B31574@blu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010903130404.B1064@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20010907160159.C621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <20010907160315.D621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010907160315.D621@lxmayr6.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>; from rohloff@in.tum.de on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:03:15PM +0200
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Ingo Rohloff wrote:
> BEWARE: DON'T USE gcc-2.95.2!
> I compiled the linux-2.4.9 version with gcc-2.95.2.
> And I can _definitely_ confirm that epic100.c triggers a compiler
> bug. (I have the erronous assembler code on my harddisk if anyone is
> interested.)
The following seems a gcc 3.0 bug, not sure it was fixed in gcc 3.01.
See the assembly generated with -O3 for the following code:
--------------------------------------------------------------
inline static long QInt(double inval)
{
long *l;
char *c = (char*) &inval;
inval = 68719476991.99;
l = (long*) (c+2);
return *l;
}
int main(void)
{
printf("%lu\n", QInt(OFFENDING_VALUE));
return 0;
}
---------------------------------------------------------------
the above function is compiled as:
.file "test2.c"
.section .rodata
.LC0:
.string "%lu\n"
.text
.align 16
.globl main
.type main,@function
main:
pushl %ebp
movl %esp, %ebp
subl $48, %esp
* movl $16776561, -32(%ebp)
* movl -30(%ebp), %eax
* movl $1110441984, -28(%ebp)
pushl %eax
pushl $.LC0
call printf
addl $16, %esp
movl %ebp, %esp
xorl %eax, %eax
popl %ebp
ret
.Lfe1:
.size main,.Lfe1-main
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 3.0"
Note the line I marked with "*".
The double var is 8 byte, it is loaded
moving two 32 bit words in the -32 and -28 offset.
Unfortunatelly with -O3 the "*l" value get
computed between the two 'movl', and not after
the second movl.
This code is really unsane anyway but this seems
a clear gcc 3.0 bug.
I hope that the gcc folks here may report the
problem if not already known.
I didn't tested it but maybe the same problem
exists with other 8 byte types like 'long long'.
regards,
antirez
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-07 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-03 11:04 epic100.c, SMC EtherPower II, SMC83c170/175 "EPIC" Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:01 ` Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:03 ` epic100.c, gcc-2.95.2 compiler bug! Ingo Rohloff
2001-09-07 14:13 ` antirez [this message]
2001-09-07 14:26 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010907161323.B31574@blu \
--to=antirez@invece.org \
--cc=epic@scyld.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rohloff@in.tum.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.